From good to evil in The Lord of the Flies Essay

The overlord of the move by William Golding is tale of a group of young boys who conk out desolate on a deserted island after their plane crashes. Intertwined in this simple novel are many themes, most that relate to the underlying diabolic that exists in any human beings and the malicious nature of mankind. In The nobleman of the fly, Golding shows the boys gradual transformation from being civilized, well-mannered plenty to savage, ritualistic beasts. From the magazine that the boys land on the island, both a power struggle and the send-off signs of the boys evil, gluttonouss mockery, occur. by and by blowing the conch and summoning all the boys to come for an assembly, an option is held. I ought to be chief , state jacks with simple arrogance, because Im chapter chorister and theme boy(page 22). This represents the beginning of civilization in all of the kids (which is changed later. ) aft(prenominal) Ralph is Chief, Jack envies his position and constantly struggle s for power with Ralph throughout the rest of the novel, convince the rest of the boys to join his tribe rather than to stay with Ralph.Also, soon after the boys arrive at the island, Piggy, a weak character, is mocked by the other boys. After trying to recount all of the liluns names, Piggy is told to Shut up, Fatty, by Jack. Ralph remarks by saying, Hes not Fatty. His real names Piggy. any of the boys on the island, except for Piggy, laugh and make themselves more comfortable at Piggys expense. A storm of laughter arose and even the tiniest tyke joined in. For a heartbeat the boys were a c digestd circuit of reason with Piggy outside(page 21). That quote shows that they are starting to become uncivilized.The boys become more comfortable with one or so other after Piggys mockery and create a bond, leaving Piggy on the outside. on with inherent evil, man is also receptive of being good and kind. while Jack and Ralph are exploring the island, they encounter a preylet whic h Jack supposedly attempts to kill. After gaining the courage to kill the baby devour, Jack talks nigh it by saying I was just waiting for a moment to decide where to stab him (page 31). This event clearly illustrates the good in Jack, since he is hesitant to kill something.Jack almost couldnt kill the pig, because he felt bad doing it.. Jacks mercy is short-lived, however, and when they encounter another pig, Jack and his hunters are relentless. They return to beach ritualistically chanting Kill the pig. sew her throat. Spill her blood, where they excitedly explain the details of the hunt. I cut the pigs throat, said Jack, proudly, and yet twitched as he said it (page 69). Jack is internally struggling in the midst of his civilized teachings and savage instincts in this manakin, in which he both proudly ex take aims his murder and twitches while doing so.Another grammatical case of the boys inherent evil is the brutal murder of the put. Without any regard for the sows newbo rns, Jack commands his tribe to attack it. The boys hurled themselves at her. This dreadful outbreak from an un comen world made her frantic she squealed and bucked and the air was full of lying-in and noise and blood and terror (page 135). The weird behavior of the boys in this example show that evil is starting to drive into them. After the death of the sow, the boys snap with its blood and ritualistically celebrate their kill. The boys show no mercy for the sow and conduct like savages.The murder of the sow allows the boys to revert back to their evilness and lose all traces of guilt and conscience. Ralph shows fatigue, a good causer of anger and dislike. He momentarily forgets the reasons why the signal fire is so important. He tried to remember. Smoke, he said, we want smoke. Course we have. The smokes a signal and we jackpott be rescued if we dont have smoke. I knew that shouted Ralph (page 172). Ralph begins to lose his initial cheerfulness and enthusiasm and replaces i t with disinterest and hate. Piggy and Ralph separate themselves from Jack and his tribe.However, when Jack and his tribe kill a pig and invite Ralph and Piggy to join their feast, the two accept and cannot resist the temptation of the meat. Later on in the celebration, Jack and his tribe perform a ritualistic dance, in which Piggy and Ralph later join. Piggy and Ralph, under the nemesis of the sky, found themselves eager to take a place in this crazy but articulationly secure society (page 152). They realize that the dance fuel the boys to murder Simon, and later deny their inciteicipation in it. We left early, said Piggy quickly, because we were tired (page 158).Ralph and Piggy recognize the evil in the dance, and know that if the others found out about their participation in it, then the boys would claim that Piggy and Ralph would be going against their own beliefs. Also, by not admitting their partaking in the dance, Piggy and Ralph are denying their involvement in Simons mu rder and their inherent evil. They do not believe that evil exists within them and believe that it allow for disappear if they do not believe in it. Simon and Ralph represent righteousness and reason, and both encounter the Lord of the Flies.The Lord of the Flies is the head of a pig which is sacrificially given to the beast in order to preserve the boys safety. Simon is the first off to talk with the Lord of the Flies ,and when he does, he learns that the beast (evil) is not in an animal out in the woods, but in the boys themselves. consider you thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill. You knew didnt you? Im part of you, (page 143) says the Lord of the Flies to Simon. The Lord of the Flies even says that the Beast is part of Simon, the symbol of goodness, suggesting that all human beings are born with both some evil and goodness.Later on while Ralph is fleeing from Jack and his tribe, he stumbles upon the Lord of the Flies. Little prickles of sensation ran up a nd down his back. The teeth grinned, the empty sockets seemed to relieve oneself his gaze masterfully and without effort (page 185). Soon after, Ralph hits the pigs head and smashes it into pieces. By destroying the Lord of the Flies, Ralph denies his internal evil and primitive instincts. The difference between Ralphs and Simons encounter with the Lord of the Flies is that Simon accepts The Lord of the Flies and listens intently to what it is saying to him.However, Ralph destroys it and then walks away from it. Both Ralphs and Simons experience with the Lord of the Flies states that all men are capable of evil, and that evil is in all humans. The Lord of the Flies illustrates the capabilities of evil in all things. All of the boys on the island are tempted by evil, but not all of them give in to the craving. However, along with the evil that lies within all plurality, there is also a little bit of goodness, suggesting that all people have the free will to choose their destiny. Th e book clearly shows how people can turn into savage beasts.