Asses the Strengths and Limitations of Unstructured Interviews

Sociology Asses the strengths and limitations of amorphous interviews for the field of view of boys underachievement at give lessons Unstructured interviews have advantages and disadvantages and as a qualitative method acting they ar expressed through words and relay heaps thoughts, encounterings and motivations. Unstructured interviews atomic number 18 interviews that dont have certain(p) interrogatives meaning its more free and relaxed. They give us a deep intelligence of the interviewees world because we go off-key use the answers they give to signifier our questions so that they atomic number 18 appropriate and relevant.However, using ambiguous interviews suffer overly cause problems, for example they happen upon a long time to conduct. When tone at the advantages and disadvantages we need to look at how this effects what we are nerve-wracking to research boys underachievement at schoolhouse as this will affect whether the advantages and limitations are relev ant to the study. A few advantages of using unstructured interviews when studying the underachievement of boys are that the informality of the interview allows the interviewer to gain the trust of the interviewee which is important in this example.Boys at school will not feel comfortable explaining their time at school and why they do/dont enjoy school if the interviewer is very formal and makes them feel intimidated whereas by using an unstructured interview it allows the boys being interviewed and the interviewee feel more comfortable around from each one other meaning the boys will be more open and honorable allowing the police detective to gain more and to collect more accurate and in attainment data.Another advantage of using this method when researching boys underachievement at school is that because in that location are no set questions the interviewer can ask questions that they feel are important and will get the most valuable and informative answers which manner the data collected will be more valuable. It also factor that from the answers that the boys give the interviewer can change and adapt his questions to develop the answer tending(p) meaning the data collected will be in depth and very informative.Finally, an advantage of using this method when studying boys underachievement at school is that the interviewee and interviewer can check each others meanings. For example, if a question is asked and the boy doesnt understand the interviewer can adapt and explain so that the boy can give a honest answer. This is very good because it allows them to explain what they mean giving the other person a deeper understanding of the questions and answers meaning the interview will be more successful.However, there are also disadvantages of using unstructured interviews when researching boys underachievement at school. Unstructured interviews can absorb a long time to conduct which means that less can be carried out. This could cause a big problem to give a good range of answers the researcher/interviewer may want to visit polar schools to see how the answers differ in different schools and in different areas.However it would take to a fault long to visit different places and schools because the actual interview takes too long itself. Another disadvantage is that it can go off root word meaning the interview is irrelevant. When interviewing a boy the interview could go off topic meaning that the interview would be useless as it wouldnt give us any informative information that could you be utilize to draw up a conclusion.Finally, another disadvantage of using this method when researching boys underachievement at school is that theyre not reliable. As its unstructured the corresponding interview cant be carried out on a lot of people as it will change each time depending on the answers given and how the interviewer responds to them. This means that researchers cant replicate the interview or compare it to their own findings so theres no bearing of knowing if its reliable or not.To conclude using unstructured interviews when researching boys underachievement at school has both advantages and disadvantages that could mean its better and worse than structures interviews. However, I believe that it would still be a good method to use as it will give informative answers and allow the researcher to find out why boys arent doing so well at school. It will still give accurate answers as the boys will feel more relaxed meaning they can be looked at and analysed meaning we can draw a conclusion from them. Hannah Smillie